Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
AUSA Extensions, Appointments, and Terminations
as 3:2016mc09007
In Re:
AUSA Extensions, Appointments, and Terminations, Elizabeth A. Ballard, Kurt R Casad and others
United States of America v. 1309 Fourth Street, La Grand, Union County, State and District of Oregon
as 2:2012cv02263
Defendant:
1309 Fourth Street, La Grand, Union County, State and District of Oregon
Claimant:
Kathy Lepper
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
AUSA Extensions, Appointments, and Terminations
as 3:2012mc09007
In Re:
AUSA Extensions, Appointments, and Terminations, Jonathan Groux, Aimee R. Lobo-Berg and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AUSA Extensions, Appointments, and Terminations
as 3:2011mc09007
In Re:
AUSA Extensions, Appointments, and Terminations, Daphne Banay, Catherine J. Caballero and others
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation v. Cycle Sports of Salem, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv06214
Defendant:
Capital Northwest, Inc., David E. Colfax, Kathy Colfax and others
Plaintiff:
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Grassmueck v. Balada et al
as 6:2010cv06076
Defendant:
Sandi Balada, Capwest Securities, Inc, Bryon Crosby and others
Plaintiff:
Receiver Michael Grassmueck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Other
Grudzinski et al v. Bradbury et al
as 6:2007cv06195
Plaintiff:
Dean Grudzinski, O. Keith Cyrus, David Olson and others
Defendant:
Bill Bradbury, Tamara J. Green, James Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
