Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lawson v. Midland Funding LLC
as 3:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
James Lawson
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawson v. Midland Funding, LLC
as 3:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Susan Lawson
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cellmark, Inc. v. Epcorp Limited et al
as 6:2014fj00003
Plaintiff:
Cellmark, Inc.
Defendant:
Epcorp Limited, Jeffrey Fitch and BIVAC North America, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Epcorp Limited and Jeffrey Fitch
Thirdparty_defendant:
Lawson & Cook Enterprises, Inc., BIVAC North America, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clayton et al v. Heartland Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
Frederick P. Clayton, Kent B. Monypeny, Beverly Ackert and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan, Mary Susan Arditi, Edward G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
