Cases 1 - 10 of 41
AJISAFE et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv04642
Plaintiff:
ABIGAEL ADEDOYIN AJISAFE, OJO LEONARD AJISAFE and OLUWAYANMIFE QUEEN AJISAFE
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
PEMBROKE PINES FIREFIGHTERS & POLICE OFFICERS PENSION FUND v. Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv20321
Plaintiff:
PEMBROKE PINES FIREFIGHTERS & POLICE OFFICERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, CARRIE ANDERSON, PETER ARDUINI and others
LEONARD v. AZAR et al
as 3:2019cv18197
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff:
GLADYS LEONARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
GUARDINO JR. v. CITY OF ORMOND BEACH
as 3:2019cv17100
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LEONARD GUARDINO JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF ORMOND BEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUARDINO v. CITY OF DELAND, FLORIDA
as 3:2019cv17088
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LEONARD GUARDINO JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF DELAND, FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENZER v. APPLE et al
as 3:2018cv03838
Plaintiff:
ALLAN MENZER
Defendant:
ROBERT F. APPLE, THOMAS J GARRITY, JACQUES GONELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CLARK v. APPLE et al
as 3:2018cv00703
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLARK
Defendant:
ROBERT F. APPLE, THOMAS J GARRITY, JACQUES GONELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
NAHAS v. SHORE MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2017cv08731
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK NAHAS
Defendant:
SHORE MEDICAL CENTER , STEVEN P. NACHTIGALL , JEFFREY GOSIN and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
