Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Clervrain v. Lee
as 6:2021mc00108
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain and Pierre Robert Joseph
Defendant: Laura M. Lee, Claude Dora, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jaime Charboneau v. Henry Atencio, et al
as 20-35875
Respondent / Appellee: HENRY ATENCIO, Director of the Idaho Department of Correction, LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, Attorney General and AL RAMIREZ, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: JAIME DEAN CHARBONEAU
Thomas Paulk v. Josh Tewalt, et al
as 20-35599
Respondent / Appellee: JOSH TEWALT and LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Petitioner / Appellant: THOMAS ZACHARY ALEC PAULK
State of Idaho v. Endo Health Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00286
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Endo International PLC and others
Plaintiff: Idaho Attorney Gen Lawrence G Wasden and State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Eugene Lavergne, et al v. United States House of Rep, et al
as 19-5028
Defendant / Appellee: Kim Guadagno, Honorable Lt. Governor/Secretary of State, Christopher Porrino, Honorable Acting New Jersey State Attorney General, Karen L. Haas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eugene Martin Lavergne
Plaintiff / Appellee: Allen J. Cannon, Frederick John Lavergne, Scott Neuman and others
Jaime Charboneau v. Henry Atencio, et al
as 17-72507
Petitioner: JAIME DEAN CHARBONEAU
Respondent: HENRY ATENCIO, Director of the Idaho Department of Correction and LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, Attorney General
International Union of Operati v. Lawrence Wasden
as 16-35963
Plaintiff - Appellant: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 370
Defendant - Appellee: LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Idaho
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court: JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff: HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-11067
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through BILL MCCOLLUM , STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through HENRY McMASTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through JON BRUNING, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?