Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Maxfield et al v. Cox et al
as 4:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Spencer Cox and Deidre Henderson
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Maxfield, Lori Newby and Daniel Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurer v. United Recovery Group et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gerald Maurer
Defendant:
United Recovery Group, URG LLC, SRL & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chen v. United Recovery Group et al
as 2:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Tim Chen
Defendant:
United Recovery Group, URG LLC, SRL & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hayes et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Peter Hayes , Thi-Ly Downing-Hays , George Eugene Barton and others
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company and PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soren v. Equable Ascent Financial et al
as 2:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Lori Soren
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial and Bennett Law
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christianson v. eTitle Insurance Agency et al
as 2:2011cv00775
Plaintiff:
Todd O. Christianson
Defendant:
eTitle Insurance Agency , Wells Fargo Bank NA , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 1:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jon W. Scott and Kari S. Scott
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA , Etitle Insurance Agency , Kent W. Plott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crain Communications et al v. Magazine Billing Services et al
as 2:2008mc00181
Plaintiff:
Crain Communications, Crain Communications, Crain Management Services and others
Defendant:
Magazine Payment Services, Publishers Clearing Emporium, Publishers Processing Service and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
