Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Tyrone Martin v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 21-2406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. LEE, LT. HOLLIS, (Use of Force) (John Doe) and others
Timothy Holmes, Jr. v. Matthew McDonough, et al
as 21-1944
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW MCDONOUGH and THOMAS M. MASON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY HOLMES, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tyrone Martin v. D. Lee, et al
as 20-3508
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE TAMMY JOHNSTON, SGT. MROZEK, LT. HOLLIS, (Use of Force) (John Doe) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE MARTIN
Danny Cohea v. C. Ducart, et al
as 20-17383
Defendant / Appellee:
C. E. DUCART, L. SAPORETTI, Correctional Counselor I, PBSP, D. BRADBURY, Chief Deputy Warden, PBSP and others
Defendant:
C. LESNIAK, Correctional Captain, C. DENMAN, Correctional Sergeant, SABRINA JOHNSON, Chief Deputy Warden, Corcoran and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Richard Drennon v. Idaho Legislative Representati, et al
as 20-35460
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID NOLAND, Idaho Tax Commission Commissioner, JULIE BRYANT, IDOC, CHRISTEN LEWIS, Tax Enforcement Official, Agent, Employee and Representative and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD J. DRENNON
Danny Cohea v. C. Ducart, et al
as 19-16783
Defendant / Appellee:
C. E. DUCART, L. SAPORETTI, Correctional Counselor I, PBSP, D. BRADBURY, Chief Deputy Warden, PBSP and others
Defendant:
C. LESNIAK, Correctional Captain, C. DENMAN, Correctional Sergeant, SABRINA JOHNSON, Chief Deputy Warden, Corcoran and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
