Cases 1 - 10 of 36
MARIN v. WPVI-TV/6ABC et al
as 2:2024cv04594
Defendant:
JEFFREY ROSEN, WARNER BROTHERS DISCOVERY, INC., THE CABLE NEWS NETWORK and others
Plaintiff:
MEL MARIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MAGGITTI v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv03168
Defendant:
LLOYDS OF AMERICA, INC, COALITION AGAINST INSURANCE FRAUD, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
GARSON et al v. CALDWELL MARINE INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2024mc00012
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GARSON, KAREN GARSON and WIFE KAREN GARSON
Defendant:
CALDWELL MARINE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ATLANTIC COAST TUG AND MARINE, LLC, CABLE BARGE and others
SKOLNICK v. EVOLUTION AB (publ) et al
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
RACHEL SKOLNICK
Defendant:
EVOLUTION AB (publ), Marin Carleslund, Jacob Kaplan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GROSS v. MARINER FINANCE, LLC
as 2:2022cv03790
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GROSS
Defendant:
MARINER FINANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 4901 Dodd-Frank Act
Ouk et al v. Murphy et al
as 2:2021cv01558
Defendant:
W Patrick Murphy and ANTONY BLINKEN
Plaintiff:
Sokhmeng Ouk, Sauchi Kim and Marin Kim
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
