Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5010
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
In re: Derrick Allen
as 23-13068
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK ALLEN
Respondent:
J SANTIAGO, WARDEN, A. MOLINA and others
Derrick AllenIn re: Derrick Allen
as 23-11961
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK ALLEN
Respondent:
J. SANTIAGO, C. MAIRANA, A. MOLINA and others
Douglas Jackson v. Mark Inch, et al
as 21-14351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK INCH, Individual and Official Capacity as Secretary, J. BALDRIDGE, Individual and Official Capacity as Warden, R SCHMITT, Individual and Official Capacity as Assistant Warden and others
Nolberto Lemus v. Department of Corrections
as 21-11916
Petitioner / Appellant:
NOLBERTO LEMUS
Respondent / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Mark Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Ibarra v. Inch
as 8:2021cv00645
Plaintiff:
Misael Ibarra, Grantee, Qualified Beneficiary, Chancery, Appointed Trustee, Misael Ibarra and others
Defendant:
Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
James West v. Mark Inch, et al
as 20-14867
Defendant / Appellee:
OSCAR ORTEGA, Chief Health Officer, JANICE HILLS, Health Service Administrator, MICHELLE SHOUEST, USC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DARYL WEST
Michael Wappler v. Celestine, et al
as 20-14538
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK INCH, secretary, in individual and official capacity, SANTOS, GLENN MORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. WAPPLER
Michel Cherfrere v. Secretary Mark Inch
as 20-13525
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK INCH, Secretary
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHEL CHERFRERE
Gordon ReidIn re: Gordon Reid
as 20-3140
Respondent:
JESSIE AYERS, A. GILLIGAN, MALACHY E. MANNION and others
Petitioner:
In re: GORDON C. REID
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
