Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Medrano v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Aurora Medrano
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Department Stores National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Medrano v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Mariana Martinez Medrano
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Debra Rogers
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 i Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Juan Medrano v. Nabors Completion and Production Services Co.
as 2:2022cv00324
Petitioner:
Juan Medrano
Respondent:
NABORS COMPLETION & PRODUCTION SERVICES CO., n/k/a C&J WELL SERVICES, INC., Nabors Completion and Production Services Co. and C and J Well Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Misael Romero v. Telesforo Medrano et al
as 5:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Best Lube and Tune, Does and Telesforo Medrano
Plaintiff:
Misael Romero
Mark Ragsdale v. F. Medrano et al
as 2:2018cv02222
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Espita, Correctional Officer Espita, Correctional Officer Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ragsdale
Samuel Love v. Ronnie L. Bunse Jr. et al
as 5:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Ronnie L. Bunse Jr., Does and Claudia J. Medrano
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
Maria Medrano Alfaro v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Maria Medrano Alfaro
Defendant:
Officer Cantun, County of Orange, Does and others
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.Martha Medrano et al
as 5:2018cv00206
Defendant:
Does and Martha Medrano
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.Martha Medrano et al
as 2:2018cv00642
Defendant:
Does and Martha Medrano
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Sandra Margarita Gutierrez Medrano v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00543
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Sandra Margarita Gutierrez Medrano
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
