Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MOODY v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 5:2020cv00061
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and SYNCHRONY BANK
Plaintiff:
DIANN L MOODY
Bey v. United States Corporation et al
as 1:2017mi00026
Plaintiff:
Wize Bey
Defendant:
United States Corporation, Moody's Wrecker Service, S&W Towing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Moody
as 1:2016cv02835
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cleothel Moody, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Turner v. The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03711
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hazel Turner
Defendant:
The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, Inc. , Rocky Payne , Elizabeth Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Moody
as 1:2014cv02313
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cleothel Moody, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Scott v. Hollis et al
as 1:2013cv02004
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Scott
Defendant:
Hollis, Homelife Subdivision Inc., Amhurst Subdivision and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Moody National RI Atlanta H, LLC, et al. v. RLJ III - Finance Atlanta, LLC
as 1:2009cv03676
Plaintiff:
Moody National RI Atlanta H, LLC, Moody National RI Atlanta H, LLC, TIC RI Atlanta 1, LLC and others
Defendant:
RLJ III - Finance Atlanta, LLC
Davis et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03127
Plaintiff:
Joy Davis, Joy Davis, Patricia Dixon and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Moody v. Simon et al
as 1:2009cv02679
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Moody
Defendant:
Teresa Simon, Zerquera, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
