Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wooten v. Morgan & Morgan et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Shanneel Wooten
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan, Deanne Hamilton, Travis Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 2302 Federal Whistleblowing Act / Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Barnett v. Lyons et al
as 5:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Johnny Barnett
Defendant:
Tammy Anderson Lyons and UK Healthcare/Norton Strategic Health Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. DASCO - Norton Home Medical Equipment, LLC
as 3:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Dwane Jones
Defendant:
DASCO - Norton Home Medical Equipment, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Norton et al v. Toothman et al
as 5:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Norton , George Norton , Carl Norton and others
Defendant:
Stephanie Toothman, Ryan Zinke, USA Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Norton et al v. Perry et al
as 5:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
Thomas Norton , George Norton , Carl Norton and others
Defendant:
Marty Perry , Vanessa Zeoli , Clare Sipple and others
Counter_claimant:
Clare Sipple
Counter_defendant:
Thomas Norton , George Norton , Carl Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scott v. Norton Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00682
Plaintiff:
Danny R Scott
Defendant:
Norton Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Tew v. Yahoo, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Tew
Defendant:
Yahoo, Inc., East Jefferson Hospital, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
