Cases 1 - 10 of 17
National Labor Relations Board v. M&B Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017mc07347
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
M&B Services, Inc., Berry Service Inc., Berry Services, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
National Labor Relations Board v. Guro Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2017mc01748
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Guro Enterprises, LLC
National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2016mc16726
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
National Labor Relations Board v. Miralda
as 2:2016mc13439
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Jose Rafael Miralda
Berry v. National Labor Relations Board
as 2:2015cv06490
Plaintiff:
Milton Berry
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
National Labor Relations Board v. Puentes New Orleans, Inc
as 2:2015mc00996
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Puentes New Orleans, Inc
Harmon v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Eldridge J. Harmon
Defendant:
Louisiana State, James Caldwell, David Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
National Labor Relations Board v. J.E.W. Design & Construction, Inc.
as 2:2012mc00640
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
J.E.W. Design & Construction, Inc.
-CN Gilreath v. Plumbers, Pipefitters & Service Technicians Local 502 et al
as 3:2011cv00217
Defendant:
Bechtel Construction Company, National Labor Relations Board, Plumbers, Pipefitters & Service Technicians Local 502 and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gilreath
Notice Only:
Michael Samuel Glassman, David L. Leightty, Kevin P. Luken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local No 5
as 3:2011mc00023
Notice Only:
Samuel Morris
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Teamsters Local No 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
