Cases 1 - 10 of 16
In re: Angel Torres
as 22-2360
Petitioner:
In re: ANGEL TORRES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PETRESE B. TUCKER
Rasheena PhiniseeIn re: Rasheena Phinisee
as 21-1145
Respondent:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, PATRICIA HAYGOOD, RANDOLPH MATTHEWS and others
Petitioner:
In re: RASHEENA PHINISEE
Marcus WhiteIn re: Marcus White
as 20-3196
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PETRESE B. TUCKER
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS WHITE
Marcus White
as 20-2286
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PETRESE B. TUCKER
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS WHITE
In re: Jason Collura
as 19-1839
Not Yet Classified:
STEFFEN BOYD, SHONDA WILLIAMS, DARLENE MILLER and others
In re: WM. C. Plouffe, Jr.
as 16-2582
Petitioner:
In re: WM. C. PLOUFFE, JR.
Respondent:
F. JAVIER CEVALLOS, PRESIDENT OF KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, AS EMPLOYEE, OFFICER SUPERVISOR, AND/OR POLICYMAKER IN HIS INDIVISUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES
Nominal Respondent:
EDWARD G. SMITH and PETRESE B. TUCKER
In re: Kendall Garland, et al
as 16-1089
Petitioner:
In re: KENDALL GARLAND
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Nominal Respondent:
PETRESE B. TUCKER
In re: Donald Jone
as 15-3969
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: DONALD JONES
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
PETRESE B. TUCKER and C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Melvin Richardson
as 15-2947
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MELVIN KEITH RICHARDSON
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, Supt. and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
PETRESE B. TUCKER
In re: Craig Saunders, et al
as 14-1538
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CRAIG SAUNDERS
Defendant - Respondent:
OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT REPORTERS DIGITAL RECORDING AND INTERPRETER ADMINISTRATION, SHARON GERMAN, Official Court Reporter and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
PETRESE B. TUCKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
