Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Noriega et al
as 1:2023cv23821
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Mario Noriega and Ceviche Inka LLC doing business as Ceviche Inka Pisco Bar & Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Pisco-Shupingahua, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3743
Petitioner:
MARILUZ PISCO-SHUPINGAHUA, JULIO SERMENO-GAVANCHO and LEONARDO SERMENO-PISCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Catherine Ingrid Palomino Carbonel
as 2:2020cv08078
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Catherine Ingrid Palomino Carbonel Individually and d/b/a Pisco Sour Market and Catherine Ingrid Palomino Carbonel Individually and doing business as Pisco Sour Market
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PISCO v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
as PAE/2:20-CV-02147
Plaintiff:
PISCO and TINA PISCO
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Nestor Eduardo Manrique
as 2:2020cv04907
Defendant:
Nestor Eduardo Manrique and Nestor Eduardo Manrique individually and doing business as Pisco Sour Market
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Nestor Eduardo Manrique et al
as 2:2019cv08733
Defendant:
Catherine I Palomino, Nestor Eduardo Manrique, Nestor Eduardo Manrique individually doing business as Pisco Sour Market and others
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
