Cases 1 - 6 of 6
DUNLAP v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY et al
as 1:2017cv02361
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DUNLAP
Defendant:
PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY , MICHAEL R. PENCE , KRIS W. KOBACH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY et al v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY et al
as 1:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY and PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT, INC.
Defendant:
PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY , OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET and MICK MULVANEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
COMMON CAUSE v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY et al
as 1:2017cv01398
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE
Defendant:
PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv01351
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP , MICHAEL PENCE and PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY et al
as 1:2017cv01354
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW
Defendant:
PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY , GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION , EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY et al
as 1:2017cv01320
Plaintiff:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Defendant:
PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY , MICHAEL PENCE , KRIS KOBACH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
