Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Sam Consiglio, Jr. v. Pamela Ahlin, et al
as 19-17496
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA AHLIN and BRANDON PRICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM CONSIGLIO, Jr.
Defendant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
Gavin Newsom, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 19-71493
Petitioner:
PAMELA AHLIN, Director of the Department of State Hospitals, DIANA TOCHE, Undersecretary for Health Care Services of the CDCR, KATHERINE TEBROCK, Deputy Director of the Statewide Mental Heath Program and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GAVIN NEWSOM, KATHERINE TEBROCK, Deputy Director of the Statewide Mental Health Program and MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance for the State of California
Not Yet Classified:
RALPH COLEMAN and MATTHEW A. LOPES, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Kirk Williams v. USDC-SAC
as 17-73369
:
In re: KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Sanford Jones v. USDCFR
as 10-70875
:
In re: SANFORD D. JONES
Petitioner:
SANFORD D. JONES
Respondent:
USDC, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
STEPHEN MAYBERG, Director of the California Department of Mental Health and PAMELA AHLIN, Executive Director of Coalinga State Hospital
Hovanski v. Ahlin
as 1:2010cv00312
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Hovanski
Respondent:
Pamela Ahlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark S. Sokolsky v. Pamela Ahlin
as 2:2009cv05783
Petitioner:
Mark S. Sokolsky
Respondent:
Pamela Ahlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
