Cases 1 - 10 of 139
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. THE BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE et al
as 3:2023cv23072
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE and THE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
Mayo Clinic et al v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv22321
Plaintiff:
Mayo Clinic and Lifepoint Corporate Services, General Partnership
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CUNNINGHAM v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 3:2023cv20701
Petitioner:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Respondent:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv18091
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DIRECTOR THOMAS A. ARNONE and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Belmar Against 5G Towers, Lawrence Reynolds, Rose Daganya and others
Counter Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY et al
as 1:2023cv04370
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY, THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALDEN LEEDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv07326
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALDEN LEEDS, INC., ALLIANCE CHEMICAL, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Intervenor:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. THE TOWNSHIP OF HARDING, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv04531
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Defendant:
THE TOWNSHIP OF HARDING, NEW JERSEY and ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HARDING, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
JOHNSON v. SAFE MOVING, LLC
as 2:2022cv03706
Plaintiff:
MORGAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
SAFE MOVING, LLC, JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES (1-20), ABC CORPORATIONS (1-20) and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
GMO TRUST et al v. BAUSCH HEALTH COMPANIES INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
GMO TRUST, GMO ALPHA ONLY FUND, GMO BENCHMARK FREE FUND and others
Defendant:
BAUSCH HEALTH COMPANIES INC. and BAUSCH + LOMB CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal: Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
