Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROSA-PHILLIPS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OWCP/DFEC
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
STANCIA ROSA-PHILLIPS
Defendant:
U. S. Dept. of Labor and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OWCP/DFEC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WATERMAN v. FIRST HORIZON CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01669
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
FIRST HORIZON CORP., HARRY V BARTON JR., KENNETH A BURDICK and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
GOODEN v. WALTON et al
as 2:2021cv00190
Defendant:
AARON WALTON, EPCOT CRENSHAW, THOMAS S. MULLER and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERRONG v. LEDNOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03452
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
LEDNOR CORPORATION, DELPHIN ETIENNE THEBAUD, III, DELPHIN ETIENNE THEBAUD, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
LOJA et al v. MELLA et al
as 2:2016cv04251
Plaintiff:
LUIS PATRICIO NAULA LOJA , JOSE ANTONIO NAULA LOJA , LUZ VICTORIA CASTRO SUMBA and others
Defendant:
EPHRAIM TAHIR MELLA , THE LAW OFFICES OF TAHIR MELLA, P.C. , WANDA MELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rivera v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC
as 3:2016mc00006
Plaintiff:
Rosa Rivera
Defendant:
Ability Recovery Services, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
