Cases 1 - 10 of 14
RODGERS v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06343
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RODGERS
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Rodgers et al v. Color Street LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03943
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers and Robert McCauley
Defendant:
COLOR STREET LLC, Fa Young Park, Lisa R Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
THE RODGERS GROUP, LLC v. LEWIS et al
as 3:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
THE RODGERS GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
MADELINE LEWIS, JOHN STRING and ASPIRANT CONSULTING GROUP LLC
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. SALL MYERS ASSOCIATES, P.A. et al
as 2:2021cv19841
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SALL MYERS ASSOCIATES, P.A., STEVEN DANE, M.D., PAUL MISTHOS, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BUSHANSKY v. CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv10785
Defendant:
JENNIFER W DAVIS, ANAT BIRD, MICHAEL J DONAHUE and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
BUSHANSKY v. FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv10787
Defendant:
JENNIFER W DAVIS, ANAT BIRD, MARK A. TURNER and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
BUSHANSKY v. WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv10789
Defendant:
JENNIFER W DAVIS, ANAT BIRD, MARK A. TURNER and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
KATZ v. E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv06212
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. PIZZI, JAMES P. HEALY, RICHARD J. CARBONE and others
Plaintiff:
ABBY KATZ
RESPLER v. E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05229
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. PIZZI, JAMES P. HEALY, RICHARD J. CARBONE and others
Plaintiff:
YAEL RESPLER
GALEANO v. E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05123
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. PIZZI, JAMES P. HEALY, RICHARD J. CARBONE and others
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE GALEANO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
