Cases 1 - 10 of 235
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kontis et al v. Mississippi Green Oil, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
David M. Kontis and Scott Shier
Defendant:
Mississippi Green Oil, LLC, Thomas J. Moore III and Charles T. Hill
Plumbers, Pipefitters and Apprentices Local No. 112 Pension Fund v. Vestis Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plumbers, Pipefitters and Apprentices Local No. 112 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Vestis Corporation, Kimberly Scott and Rick Dillon
Adams v. Holler Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Sherry Adams
Defendant:
Holler Law Firm, Najarian Capital, LLC, Scott K. Camp and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Marselis v. Fox Factory Holding Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Ryan Marselis
Defendant:
Fox Factory Holding Corp., Michael C. Dennison, Dennis C. Schemm and others
Washington v. Scott
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Tasheika A. Washington
Defendant:
Judge Jewel C. Scott
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SCOTT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WAYNE SCOTT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
