Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jackson v. Direct Building Supplies LLC
as 4:2023cv01569
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Direct Building Supplies, LLC doing business as ReNu Solar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
JACKSON v. DIRECT BUILDING SUPPLIES LLC
as 2:2023cv03615
Plaintiff:
GERARD JACKSON
Defendant:
DIRECT BUILDING SUPPLIES LLC doing business as RENU SOLAR
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chasse v. Sunvena Solar LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Evan Chasse
Defendant:
Sunvena Solar LLC and Hunter Potalivo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BOSCH SOLAR ENERGY CORPORATION v. THE TRI-M GROUP LLC
as 2:2022mc00073
Plaintiff:
Bosch Solar Energy Corporation
Defendant:
TRI-M CORPORATION and THE TRI-M GROUP LLC
DOBBS v. PRO CUSTOM SOLAR D/B/A MOMENTUM SOLAR
as 5:2021cv04435
Plaintiff:
RYAN DOBBS
Defendant:
PRO CUSTOM SOLAR D/B/A MOMENTUM SOLAR
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CICCOTELLI v. CANTEL MEDICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv01756
Defendant:
LAURA FORESE, PETER PRONOVOST, CANTEL MEDICAL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
PRZEPIOSKI et al v. PRO CUSTOM SOLAR LLC
as 2:2021cv01071
Defendant:
PRO CUSTOM SOLAR LLC doing business as MOMENTUM SOLAR
Plaintiff:
GEORGIANNA MARIE PRZEPIOSKI and JOHN JAY PRZEPIOSKI
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
DUDLEY et al v. VISION SOLAR, LLC
as 2:2021cv00659
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR DUDLEY, ROBERT DUDLEY, BRIAN DUDLEY and others
Defendant:
VISION SOLAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
SMITH et al v. VISION SOLAR LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02185
Plaintiff:
FRED HEIDARPOUR and STEWART SMITH
Defendant:
VISION SOLAR LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
