Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Wallace McCullough v. Benjamin Pearlman, et al
as 19-1382
Defendant:
Benjamin Gerard Pearlman, Sarpy County Attorney and Nicole Hutter, Sarpy County Attorney
Defendant / Appellee:
Rachel Spurgeon, #865 - Sarpy County Deputy Inv, Darin Morrissey, #866 - Sarpy County Sheriff and Sarpy County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wallace R. McCullough
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Pete Ricketts, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
Pete Ricketts, In his Capacity as Governor of the State of Nebraska, Doug Peterson, In his Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and Todd Schmaderer, In his Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Omaha
Defendant:
Gary Troutman, in his capacity as City Administrator of Bellevue, Nebraska, Leonard Houloose, in his capacity as Chief of the Papillion Police Department, L. Kenneth Polikov, in his capacity as Sarpy County Attorney and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Gary Troutman, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-2601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
Gary Troutman, in his capacity as City Administrator of Bellevue, Nebraska, Dave Heineman, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Nebraska, Jon Bruning, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Gary Troutman, et al
as 10-2046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
Gary Troutman, in his capacity as City Administrator of Bellevue, Nebraska, Dave Heineman, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Nebraska, Jon Bruning, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.