Cases 1 - 10 of 13
KOVALEV v. CITYLIFE-PA, PC et al
as 2:2022cv01281
Defendant:
CITYLIFE-PA, PC, TIMOTHY M. PETRIKIN, CITYLIFE HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kovalev v. Spark Energy, LLC
as 2:2022cv00675
Defendant:
Spark Energy, LLC and Spark Energy
Plaintiff:
Sergei Kovalev
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
KOVALEV v. THE COVENANT REAL ESTATE GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2021cv05680
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant:
THE COVENANT REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, WATSON SAINTSULNE and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
KOVALEV v. CITYLIFE-PA, PC et al
as 2:2021cv05517
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant:
CITYLIFE-PA, PC, AMPERSAND HEALTH-PA,LLC and MPULSE MOBILE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
KOVALEV v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv05790
Defendant:
SHANNON G ZABEL, NANCY A KAMMERDEINER, PAULA WEISS and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
KOVALEV v. STEPANSKY, DMD et al
as 2:2019cv05579
Respondent:
JOHN DOE I, IRINA STEPANSKY, DMD and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-50
Petitioner:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
AKISHEV v. KAPUSTIN
as 2:2017mc00146
Plaintiff:
ARDAK AKISHEV
Defendant:
SERGEY KAPUSTIN
Cause Of Action: copy of Order from Another District Court
Type:
Other Statutes
BLATT v. GOOGLE, INC.
as 5:2014cv07192
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDREW BLATT
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC., UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GOOGLE INC., AOL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
KOTSYUBA v. DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2014cv01413
Plaintiff:
SERGEY KOTSYUBA
Defendant:
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and DISCOVER BANK
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
GRIGORYEV v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2012cv03483
Plaintiff:
SERGEY GRIGORYEV
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO , ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS , EVANGELINA KLAPAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
