Cases 1 - 10 of 1,743
Rankin et al v. Kirsch et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Prince Rankin and Najah Abdel Aziz
Defendant:
Gary M Kirsh, M.D. and Tri-State Urologic Services, P.S.C., Inc. doing business as The Urology Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pierre Investments, Inc. v. Mockensturm, LTD et al.
as 3:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Pierre Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Mockensturm, LTD, Brandon Rehkopf, Mark Mockensturm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CBIZ, Inc. et al. v. Cryan et al.
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
CBIZ, Inc., CBIZ Benefits & Insurance Services, Inc. and CBIZ Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory J. Cryan, Jerry Keith Bowman, Jr., William M. Haynes and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
