Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff: Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant: The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
SHAEFFER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/9:20-CV-00661
Plaintiff: SHAEFFER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
SHAEFFER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-67333
Plaintiff: SHAEFFER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
SHAEFFER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/7:20-CV-63669
Plaintiff: SHAEFFER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
SHAEFFER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/7:20-CV-34253
Plaintiff: SHAEFFER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Melody Yiru v. Worldventures Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04357
Defendant: Michael Azcue, DOES, Wayne Nugent and others
Unknown: Joshua Aryeh-Lev Bornstein, John Shaeffer, Joshua Aryeh-Lev Bornstein and others
Plaintiff: Melody Yiru
Reneau et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:17-cv-04139
Plaintiff: Laura Reneau , Norma Estrada , Alicia Murillo and others
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Womens Health LLC and others
In re: Shaeffer Coleman
as 15-14697
Petitioner: In re: SHAEFFER COLEMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Bernard Hamilton v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-72408
: In re: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Petitioner: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest: ADAMIK, Officer, WHITSON, Sergeant, T. LEE, Sergeant and others
Bernard Hamilton v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-70011
: In re: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Petitioner: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest: ADAMIK, Officer, WHITSON, Sergeant, T. LEE, Sergeant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?