Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Devassy et al v. Signal International, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06221
Plaintiff:
Varghese Kurisinkal Devassy , George Chacko Edavazhickal , Prasad Kunju Kunju and others
Defendant:
Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Malvern C. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Achari et al v. Signal International, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06218
Plaintiff:
Lakshmanan Ponnayan Achari , Kodakeril Baby Biji , Xavier Disoliyan and others
Defendant:
Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Malvern C. Burnett and others
Consol_defendant:
Indo-Amerisoft LLC, Kurella Rao, J&M Associates, Inc. of Mississippi and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Varghese Kurisinkal Devassy , George Chacko Edavazhickal , Ampattu Varughese Mathew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Agro et al v. BP PLC et al
as 2:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
Joseph Agro , Isaac Anderson , George Ayers and others
Defendant:
BP PLC, BP America, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Sawhney v. TD Ameritrade
as 2:2009cv07651
Plaintiff:
Amar Paul Singh Sawhney
Defendant:
TD Ameritrade
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
David et al v. Signal InternationaL LLC et al
as 2:2008cv01220
Plaintiff:
Kurian David, Sony Vasudevan Sulekha, Palanyandi Thangamani and others
Defendant:
Signal InternationaL LLC, Malvern C. Burnett, Gulf Coast Immigration Law Center, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sleep Innovations, Inc. v. Sinomax USA Inc. et al
as 3:2007mc00029
Plaintiff:
Sleep Innovations, Inc.
Defendant:
Sinomax USA Inc., Sinomax Enterprises (USA) LLC, Sinomax Enterprises Limited and others
Abraham, et al v. Singh, et al
as 2:2004cv00044
Plaintiff:
Rajeswara Rao Jami, Davis Mathai Puthussery, Abraham Dowrla and others
Defendant:
Labor Consultants International, Falcon Steel Structures, Terry Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
