Cases 1 - 10 of 821
McLean v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 24-3086
Plaintiff:
LENROY MCLEAN
Defendant:
PHILLIP GUTIERREZ, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, FNU HERNANDEZ, Office Staff, in his/her individual capacity, FNU JENKINS, Unit Manager, in his/her individual and official capacity and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
WB and B Executive Search v. City of New York
as 24-845
Plaintiff:
WB AND B EXECUTIVE SEARCH
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BRAD LANDER, in his capacity as Comptroller of the City of New York, OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK CITY COMPTROLLER and others
Williams v. Root Staff Corporation
as 1:2024mc21223
Plaintiff:
Stacey J. Williams and Stacey J. Edmonds
Defendant:
Root Staff Corporation
Tripathy v. Lockwood
as 24-837
Plaintiff:
SANJAY TRIPATHY, -
Defendant:
Captain LOCKWOOD, Reverand HARRIS, SORC R. HOFFMAN, IGRC Chairperson and others
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
McDowell v. Planet Fitness Staff
as 24-1643
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MAURICE MCDOWELL
Defendant:
PLANET FITNESS STAFF, of 13119 Hawthorne Blvd, Hawthorne, California 90250
Razzoli v. Richmond University Medical Center
as 24-544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAZZOLI
Defendant:
RICHMOND UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Dr. DOUGLAS COHEN, Dr. AMI RAVAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
