Cases 1 - 10 of 387
Odom v. Fhurer
as 24-3868
Petitioner:
ALONZO ODOM
Respondent:
COREY FHURER, Superintendent Oregon State Penitentiary
Munywe v. Jackson
as 24-3490
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MUTHEE MUNYWE
Defendant:
ROB JACKSON, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
Lambert v. Kastle, et al.
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LAMBERT
Defendant:
MIRIAM KASTLE, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU), DENNIS MCNEMARA, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU), KATHY GREY, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU) and others
Ejonga-Deogracias v. Sinclair, et al.
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
JOJO EJONGA-DEOGRACIAS
Defendant:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Secretary, Department of Corrections, MICHAEL OBENLAND, Superintendent, Monroe Correctional Complex, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
Smith v. Haight-Biehler, et al.
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
PIERRE SMITH
Defendant:
HEIDI HAIGHT-BIEHLER, Medical Doctor, BASS, First Name Unknown, HSA, Health Services Administrator, BULGER, First Name Unknown, MLP, Health Services Professional and others
Whitaker v. Steward, et al.
as 24-1272
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WHITAKER
Defendant:
HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR, Acting Director, ODOC, STEVE ROBBINS, Chief Financial Officer, ODOC, BOB CULP, Central Trust Manager, ODOC and others
Demos v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS and Abner Edras Maiominides
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHERYL STRANGE, ROBERT JACKSON, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary and others
Bradford v. Kelly
as 23-3697
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVELL LAMONTE BRADFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
In re: Sanchez
as 23-6137
Petitioner:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
In re: Wood
as 23-6129
Petitioner:
TREMANE WOOD
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
