Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Roitman et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
as 1:2023cv06159
Plaintiff:
Feliks Roitman and Yekaterina Shkolnik
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wright v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
as 1:2023cv04406
Plaintiff:
Garfield Wright
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
100 Consumers v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv09710
Petitioner:
100 Consumers
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cheng v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
as 7:2022cv03996
Plaintiff:
Mr. calvin cheng and Calvin Cheng
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Cheng v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
as 1:2021cv01085
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mr. calvin cheng and Calvin Cheng
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
Knights v. Legere et al
as 1:2016cv06965
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jason Knights
Defendant:
John J. Legere and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Domino's National Advertising Fund, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2016cv07064
Plaintiff:
Domino's National Advertising Fund, Inc.
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bartolomeo v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00387
Plaintiff:
Scott Bartolomeo
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
T-Mobile USA Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06500
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MetroPCS Wireless Inc., T-Mobile USA Inc., VoiceStream Wireless Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
