Cases 1 - 8 of 8
William Whitman v. State Farm Life Insurance Comp
as 21-80104
Respondent:
WILLIAM T. WHITMAN
Petitioner:
STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Donald Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al
as 20-3414
Defendant / Appellee:
SATYA RHODES-CONWAY, Mayor, GEORGE L. CHRISTENSON, in his official capacity as the Milwaukee County Clerk, WISCONSIN STATE CONFERENCE NAACP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and CHRISTINE T. WHITMAN
WHITMAN v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2007mc00053
Petitioner:
CANDACE T. WHITMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
SIERRA CLUB v. JOHNSON
as 1:2001cv01597
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
CHRISTINE T. WHITMAN
Intervenor_defendant:
COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR IMPLEMENTATION and AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL
Movant:
STATE OF NEVADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7671
SIERRA CLUB v. JOHNSON
as 1:2001cv01582
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
CHRISTINE T. WHITMAN
Movant:
STATE OF NEVADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7671
SIERRA CLUB v. JOHNSON
as 1:2001cv01578
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
CHRISTINE T. WHITMAN
Intervenor_defendant:
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES , COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR IMPLEMENTATION and AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL
Movant:
STATE OF NEVADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
SIERRA CLUB v. JOHNSON, et al
as 1:2001cv01558
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
CHRISTINE T. WHITMAN
Intervenor_defendant:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL and COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR IMPLEMENTATION
Movant:
STATE OF NEVADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
SIERRA CLUB v. JOHNSON, et al
as 1:2001cv01548
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
CHRISTINE T. WHITMAN
Intervenor_defendant:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL , COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR IMPLEMENTATION, ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES and others
Movant:
STATE OF NEVADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
