Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Tate v. Chemed Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Tate
Defendant:
Chemed Corporation, VITAS Healthcare Corporation, VITAS Hospice Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tate v. Chemed Corporation et al
as 2:2024at00580
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Tate
Defendant:
Chemed Corporation, VITAS Healthcare Corporation, VITAS Hospice Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Houlsen v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01817
Plaintiff:
Adam Houlsen
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cincinnati Insurance Company et al v. Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01770
Defendant:
Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC, Cadogan Tate, Andy Rock Fine Art Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company and Springfield Museum of Art
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Dominique-Tate v. Target Corporation
as 2:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
La Nita M. Dominique-Tate
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COALITION FOR APP FAIRNESS et al v. APPLE INC.,
as 4:2021mc80194
Petitioner:
COALITION FOR APP FAIRNESS, FORBES TATE PARTNERS LLC and MEGHAN DIMUZIO
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
