Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carswell v. Anderson, et al.
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Jack Christopher Carswell
Defendant:
Nicholas Anderson, Terry Hodges, Nathan Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
John and Jane Does 1-104 v. Wasden et al
as 1:2016cv00429
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden, Kevin Kempf, Terry Kirkham and others
Plaintiff:
John and Jane Does 1-104
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rocky Mountain Medical Management, LLC et al v. LHP Hospital Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Medical Management, LLC and Terry Elquist
Defendant:
LHP Hospital Group, Inc. , Portneuf Health Care Foundation, LHP Management Services, LLC and others
Movant:
Skyline Surgery Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Friends of the Clearwater v. U.S. Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2011cv00490
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Clearwater
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, Tom Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Kerr et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
Terry Kerr
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kerr et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
Terry Kerr
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams, et al v. USA
as 4:2003cv00049
Plaintiff:
Timm Adams , Barbara Adams , Arrow Head Potato Co and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
