Cases 1 - 10 of 21
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
Lima v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv02151
Plaintiff:
Dario De Almeida Lima
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. BRISCO et al
as 2:2023mc00033
Defendant:
FREDIRICK SAFRANKO, MARCUS TODD BRISCO, YAS CASETLLUM LLC and others
Receiver:
KELLY CRAWFORD
Plaintiff:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
GORLAMARI v. VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
KRANTHI GORLAMARI
Defendant:
VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TED WHITE, P. TERENCE KOHLER JR. and others
Hessler v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv05335
Plaintiff:
Carol Hessler
Defendant:
LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS, GREGG HOLST and others
Nominal Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOPKINS v. DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv04976
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY, STEPHEN C JUMPER, CRAIG W COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
WATERMAN v. RED LION HOTELS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00916
Defendant:
R CARTER PATE, JOSPEH B MEGIBOW, FREDERIC F BRACE and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
POTTER v. VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03447
Defendant:
VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BRIAN DAVIS and TED WHITE
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH POTTER
ROBBINS v. AIRGAS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN GOODBAUDY ROBBINS
Defendant:
AIRGAS, INC., JOHN P. CLANCEY, JAMES W. HOVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOJCICKI v. AIRGAS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06787
Plaintiff:
JASON WOJCICKI
Defendant:
AIRGAS, INC., JOHN P. CLANCEY, JAMES W. HOVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
