Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Melissa Wilson, et al v. Wendy Long, et al
as 20-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S. P., by next friend J.P., C. A., by next friend D.A., MAYAN SAID and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GABE ROBERTS, in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration and Director of the Bureau of TennCare, STUART MCWHORTER, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration and DANIELLE W. BARNES, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Human Services
Defendant:
RAQUEL HATTER, Tennessee Commissioner of Human Services, LARRY B. MARTIN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration and WENDY LONG
Donna Cook v. Marcia Garner, et al
as 19-5931
Defendant / Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and MARCIA GARNER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA LEE COOK
Shameca Burt v. Tennessee Dept Human Services
as 19-5346
Defendant / Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAMECA LASHON BURT
Watkins v. Tennessee Department of Human Services, et al.
as 2:2014cv02751
Petitioner:
Myra Watkins
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Human Services and Raquel Hatter
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Sewell v. Tennessee Department of Human Services
as 2:2014cv02595
Petitioner:
Margaret Sewell
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Human Services
Respondent:
Raquel Hatter
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Mayberry v. Tennessee Department of Human Services
as 2:2014cv02533
Plaintiff:
Hazel Mayberry
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Human Services and Raquel Hatter
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Abron-Ervin et al v. Lodge et al
as 3:2010mc00014
Plaintiff:
Jonina M. Abron-Ervin and Lorenzo Edward Ervin, Jr.
Defendant:
Gina Lodge and Tennessee Department of Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
