Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of Kansas, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of Kansas, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Buckler v. Austin, III, et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Philip Traugott Buckler
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth and others
Buckler v. Austin, III, et al
as 4:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP BUCKLER and Philip Traugott Buckler
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth, in her Official Capacity as US Secretary of Army and others
Harp v. United States Army Special Operations Command
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Seth Harp
Defendant:
United States Army Special Operations Command
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
