Cases 1 - 6 of 6
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND OF EASTERN PA v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06312
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND OF EASTERN PA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Anne Arundel Co MD v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00384
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Anne Arundel Co MD
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv22917
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jackson County, Missouri v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04531
Plaintiff:
Jackson County, Missouri
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and others
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
as 2:2023md03080
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
HON. JOSEPH A. DICKSON
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF MONTANA, EX. REL., THE STATE OF KANSAS EX. REL., TIMOTHY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GENESIS LABORATORY MANAGEMENT LLC v. UNITED HEALTH GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv12057
Plaintiff:
GENESIS LABORATORY MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant:
OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and UNITED HEALTH GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
