Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RAD v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
as 3:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RAD v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2015cv02415
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and MARK COYEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BUCKSHAW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010mc00249
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC CITY AND PRINCETON BOROUGH LAW DEPARTMENTS, UNIVERSITY OF PRINCETON- OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL and others
BUCKSHAW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010mc00246
Plaintiff:
JOHN J BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC CITY MUNICIPAL COURT, PRINCETON BOROUGH and others
WOLFF v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2010cv04051
Plaintiff:
DERISH M. WOLFF
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT & GAMING ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. et al
as 3:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT & GAMING ASSOCIATION, INC., NEW JERSEY THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC., THOROUGHBRED BREEDERS ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RALPH J. MARRA, JR. and ABC SPORTS ORGANIZATIONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HAWASH v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2007cv00033
Petitioner:
JEHAD M. HAWASH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
