Other Statutes Cases
Innovation Law Lab, et al v. Kevin McAleenan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15716
Defendant / Appellant: TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv01343
Plaintiff: Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, Central American Resource Center, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies at the University of California Hastings College of the Law and others
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Innovation Law Lab et al v. Nielsen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant: John Lafferty, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Lee Francis Cissna and others
Plaintiff: Tahirih Justice Center, Innovation Law Lab, Immigration and Deportation Defense Clinic at the University of San Francisco School of Law and others
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv04969
Plaintiff: Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach , Central American Resource Center , Center for Gender & Refugee Studies and others
Defendant: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?