Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Skydiving School, Inc. v. GoJump America, LLC, et al.
as 24-1822
Plaintiff:
SKYDIVING SCHOOL, INC., dba Skydive Hawaii
Defendant:
GOJUMP AMERICA, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, GOJUMP HAWAII, LLC, a Hawai'i limited liability company and MICHAEL VETTER
Lawrence v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06232
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, John E. Adent, James C. Borel and others
Dvoinik, et al v. Philipp, et al
as 8:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Elena Dvoinik and Boris Zavadovsky
Defendant:
Peter Philipp, Clemens Dietachmair, Mario Rabl and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 22-1383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BUCHER, WILLIAM BYRWA, BILL DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, FCA US, LLC, ALPHONS IACOBELLI and others
WATERMAN v. NEOGEN CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
NEOGEN CORP., JAMES C BOREL, WILLIAM T BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Leja v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
Jan Leja
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, James C. Borel, William T. Boehm and others
Pardo v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Erick Pardo
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, James C. Borel, William T Boehm and others
Stein v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02683
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, John E. Adent, William T. Boehm and others
Hopkins v. Neogen Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Neogen Corp., James C. Borel, William T. Boehm and others
Snyder v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02440
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Snyder
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, John E. Ardent, James C. Borel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
