Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ASANTE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv00601
Plaintiff:
ASANTE, YUMA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ASANTE THREE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SEEMA VERMA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv00599
Not Classified By Court:
ASANTE ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, THREE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
In Re: ALLINA II-TYPE DSH ADJUSTMENT CASES
as 1:2019mc00190
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
In Re:
ALLINA II-TYPE DSH ADJUSTMENT CASES
Plaintiff:
COOKEVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUTHORITY, MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, INC., ST. JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
ASANTE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2019cv02512
Defendant:
Secretary ALEX M. AZAR, II, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
ASANTE, YUMA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BATES COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2019cv01767
Defendant:
ROBERT G. EATON, SEEMA VERMA and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
BATES COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GHS LAURENS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
CAPE FEAR VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
CAPE FEAR VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ASHLEY VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01030
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER , AVERA QUEEN OF PEACE , AVERA ST. LUKE'S and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER v. THOMPSON
as 1:2003cv00477
Plaintiff:
ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
