Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PS) Johnson v. El Dorado County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv02843
Defendant:
Alling & Jillson, LTD, El Dorado County Superior Court, David L. DeVore and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Knox Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ed Baeza et al v. Reliant Life Shares, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Ed Baeza, Concepcion Baeza, Ansary Bassir and others
Defendant:
Reliant Life Shares, LLC, RLS Financial Services, Inc., RMS Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal - SEC Act
Crowder et al v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 4:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Todd Crowder, Kevin Schulte and Garrick Vance
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Vance et al v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 3:2021mc80156
Petitioner:
Smugmug, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tim Janecyk and Steven Vance
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Vance Masci v. QTC Medical Group, Inc.
as 2:2019cv10844
Plaintiff:
Vance Masci
Defendant:
QTC Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Roy Dellinger v. YogaWorks, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00970
Defendant:
Stephens Inc., Michael A. Kumin, Guggenheim Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Dellinger
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
