Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Farrell v. Webbank Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv03630
Plaintiff:
Meghan Farrell
Defendant:
Webbank Corporation and Popular Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00832
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Loughnane v. Zukowski Rogers Flood & McArdle et al
as 1:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Richard G Flood, Michael J Smoron, Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
David Loughnane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farrell v. Target Corporation
as 1:2015cv05112
Plaintiff:
Mary Farrell
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2015cv05070
Plaintiff:
Louetta Schulze, Thomas Moors, John Hollis and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., General Nutrition Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
In Re:
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Farrell v. Illinois Collection Service, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02535
Plaintiff:
Nicole Farrell
Defendant:
Illinois Collection Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burrow v. Sybaris Clubs International, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02342
Defendant:
Sybaris Clubs International, Inc. , Randall D Repke and Charlene Farrell
Plaintiff:
Robert C Burrow
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
