Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc., RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BELCASTRO et al v. SIMPLEX HOMES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
VINCENT BELCASTRO and PATRICIA BELCASTRO
Defendant:
SIMPLEX HOMES, INC., GREGORY PETERS, APPLE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MODE GLOBAL, LLC v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2024cv02389
Plaintiff:
MODE GLOBAL, LLC
Defendant:
RYAN H. HARRIS and BRYAN PETERS
BERDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERDAN, SUSAN K. WILSON, JESSICA BRUCKNER and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
ZELMA v. HALPERIN et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. ZELMA
Defendant:
MICHAEL PETER HALPERIN, HFA HOLDINGS LLP, IP HORIZON INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv23419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
BERDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERDAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
