Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dahdal et al v. USA
as 3:2020cv01185
Plaintiff:
Wael Dahdal, Jousalin Dahdal and Willie Hill Top Market, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sondel v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01861
Petitioner:
Nimali Sondel
Respondent:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , GMRI, Inc. and Willis Reinke
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Sondel v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv01861
Petitioner:
Nimali Sondel
Respondent:
Darden Restaurants, Inc., GMRI, Inc. and Willis Reinke
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al v. Sondel et al
as 3:2015cv01138
Plaintiff:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , GMRI, Inc. and Willis Reinke
Defendant:
Nimali Sondel and JAMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Intrawest ULC et al
as 3:2015mc00053
Plaintiff:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Defendant:
Intrawest ULC , Federal Insurance Company, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Intrawest ULC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Willis North America, Inc, Willis of New York, Inc, Willis Insurance Brokerage of Utah, Inc. and others
Witne:
William Bridgman and Craig Parrow
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
Gayle et al v. Harry's Nurses Registry Inc et al
as 3:2012mc00141
Plaintiff:
Claudia Gayle, Sussan Ajiboye, Sulaiman Ali-El and others
Defendant:
Harry's Nurses Registry Inc and Harry Dorvilier
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v Bridgeport Hospital, et al
as 3:2002cv01205
Defendant:
Clarinda Mental Health Ctr, Baptist Med Ctr - Beaches, Lawnwood Regional Med Ctr and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
