Cases 1 - 10 of 18
NJOY, LLC v. Imiracle (HK) Limited et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
NJOY, LLC
Defendant:
Imiracle (HK) Limited, Shenzhen iMiracle Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Weiboli Technology Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
NJOY LLC v. iMiracle HK Limited et al
as 2:2023cv08798
Defendant:
American Vape Company LLC, iMiracle HK Limited, Shenzhen iMiracle Technology Co. Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
NJOY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
CW Baise Limited v. Wisdomobile Group Limited et al
as 5:2020cv03526
Defendant:
Wisdomobile Group Limited, Wisdomobile HK Limited, Wisdomobile Limited and others
Plaintiff:
CW Baise Limited
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Khoros, LLC v. Lenovo Singapore PTE LTD
as 3:2020cv03399
Plaintiff:
KHOROS, LLC
Defendant:
LENOVO SINGAPORE PTE LTD, Lenovo (Beijing) LTD, Lenovo (United States), Inc. and others
Chieng Hsing HK Co., Ltd v. H S Global Trading Group Collection et al
as 2:2018cv02037
Plaintiff:
Chieng Hsing HK Co., Ltd
Defendant:
H S Global Trading Group, LLC and Rashmibhai Shah
Cynthia Grant v. HKS, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv01505
Defendant:
Does, HKS, Inc. and Scott B. Hunter
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Grant
Spy Optic Inc v. caiyunhengton 168 9 et al
as 2:2017cv07649
Defendant:
2.95886, 256ctl, 4318964 and others
Plaintiff:
Spy Optic Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nehemiah Kong v. Ma and Sons Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05892
Defendant:
DOES, HK Aram, Inc. and Ma and Sons Enterprise, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nehemiah Kong
Buelow et al v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited et al
as 5:2015cv05179
Plaintiff:
Gary Buelow , Rustem Nurlybayev and Michael Hercules
Defendant:
Alibaba Group Holding Limited , Jack Yun Ma, Joseph C. Tsai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
