Cases 1 - 10 of 134,762
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johanson Transportation Service v. Shelby Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Johanson Transportation Service
Defendant:
Shelby Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Tactacell, LLC v. Deer Management Systems, LLC et al
as 3:2024mc80121
Plaintiff:
Tactacell, LLC
Defendant:
Deer Management Systems, LLC and Tactacam, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Non-Party Bertram Capital Management, LLC
Liu v. UNM Rainforest Innovations
as 5:2024mc80122
Petitioner:
Weifen Liu
Respondent:
UNM Rainforest Innovations
Watt v. Block, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Jody Watt
Defendant:
Block, Inc., Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. et al v. Alco Iron & Metal Company
as 1:2024at00399
Plaintiff:
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. and Clean Harbors Buttonwillow, LLC
Defendant:
Alco Iron & Metal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Jewell Vines v. Loandepot.com, LLC
as 8:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Tonia Jewell Vines
Defendant:
Loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sandford v. Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04078
Plaintiff:
Jason Sandford
Defendant:
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Paul Sapan v. CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC
as 8:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Paul Sapan
Defendant:
CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
