Cases 1 - 10 of 4,169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
First National Bank and Trust Company of Okmulgee v. Young
as 6:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
First National Bank and Trust Company of Okmulgee
Defendant:
Patricia Boyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
A G Equipment Company v. Edison Health Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
A G Equipment Company
Defendant:
Edison Health Solutions, LLC, Crumdale Partners, LLC and Pan-American Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hughes v. Western Governors University
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Tiernan Hughes
Defendant:
Western Governors University
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alltel Corporation v. City of Sapulpa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Alltel Corporation doing business as Verizon Wireless
Defendant:
City of Sapulpa, Oklahoma, City Planning Commission of the City of Sapulpa, City Council of the City of Sapulpa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
