Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Ellis v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2012cv02059
Defendant:
Bank of America , Countrywide Home Loans (Inc), Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bisson, et al v. Bank of America, et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bisson , Douglas and Suzanne Knutson , Albert Pearson and others
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Countrywide Bank FSB, BAC Home Loans Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daddabbo et al v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01417
Plaintiff:
Cesare Daddabbo and Amy Daddabbo
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans Inc, Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc Trust 2006-HE6, Wells Fargo & Deutsche National Trust Company Trustee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Erickson v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv05666
Plaintiff:
RYAN SHAWN ERICKSON
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, ReconTrust Company NA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vasilchuk et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2010cv01418
Plaintiff:
Dmitriy Vasilchuk and Tatyana Vasilchuk
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , Recontrust Company, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beyer v. Countywide Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 2:2007cv01512
Plaintiff:
Joseph Beyer
Defendant:
Countywide Home Loans Servicing LP, Countywide Home Loans Servicing LP, Countywide Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
White et al v. Homefield Financial Inc et al
as 3:2007cv05114
Plaintiff:
Dennis V White and Judith White
Defendant:
Homefield Financial Inc, Homefield Financial Inc, Homefield Financial Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
