Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Parra v. CitiMortage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01840
Plaintiff:
William Parra
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Morris Hardwick Schneider and DOES 1-10
Joseph v. Colonial Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv01475
Plaintiff:
Lisa Joseph
Defendant:
Colonial Bank, N.A., Melrose Homes, LLC, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Minaird v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Julius Minaird
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Morris Hardwick Schneider, LLC
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Morris
as 1:2013cv00139
Defendant:
Lynda J. Morris
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Bullard v. CitiMortgage Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04410
Plaintiff:
Freida Bullard
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Amtrust Mortgage Corporation and others
City Mortgage Inc. v. Morris
as 1:2012cv03690
Plaintiff:
City Mortgage Inc.
Defendant:
Lynda J. Morris
Harrison v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Levine & Block, LLP et al
as 1:2012cv03310
Plaintiff:
Morris E. Harrison
Defendant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Levine & Block, LLP and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gray v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03287
Plaintiff:
Eddie N. Gray
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Morris, Hardwick, Schneider, LLC
Counter_claimant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Eddie N. Gray
Citi Reo Holdings, Inc. v. Morris et al
as 1:2012cv01978
Plaintiff:
Citi Reo Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Jane Morris and Camille Baptiste
Cross_claimant:
Camille Baptiste and Jane Morris
Cross_defendant:
Citi Reo Holdings, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Camille Baptiste and Jane Morris
Counter_defendant:
Citi Reo Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Fleuranvil v. Flagstar Bank FSB et al
as 1:2011cv04604
Plaintiff:
Alfred Fleuranvil
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank FSB, Morris, Hardwick, & Schneider, McCalla Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
