Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Smith et al v. Citi Mortgage et al
as 1:2013cv02537
Plaintiff:
Reginald D. Smith and Michelle Jones
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage , Pendergast & Associates, P.C. , McCalla Raymer LLC and others
Parra v. CitiMortage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01840
Plaintiff:
William Parra
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Morris Hardwick Schneider and DOES 1-10
Hill v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2013cv01639
Plaintiff:
Anne Hill
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association , Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and DOES 1-10
Stubbs et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv01425
Plaintiff:
Lester K, Stubbs and Nitza M. Lewis Stubbs
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Dempsey v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2013cv01350
Plaintiff:
Don G. Dempsey, II
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , CitiMortgage, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Shah v. Shapiro & Swertfeger, LLP, et. al.
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Wahid Shah
Defendant:
Shapiro & Swertfeger, LLP and Does 1-10
Rodriguez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
Luis Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Does 1-10 inclusive
Mazyck v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv03875
Plaintiff:
Karolen Mazyck
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and John Does 1-10
Redmond v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv03790
Plaintiff:
Marlene Redmond
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, John Doe 1-10 and others
Janolkar v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Shrikant U. Janolkar
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. , Urban Trust Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
